Team Saxo Bank
Team Saxo Bank
Home | Profile | Register | Active Topics | Members | Search | FAQ
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

 All Forums
 Team Saxo Bank
 Team Saxo Bank
 Doping affairs in Cycling since 1980
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 28

TeamB
Stagiaire

South Africa
47 Posts

Posted - 20/05/2010 :  13:52:48  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Finally ! Great to see a high profile cyclist admit to what we all know already. Years of denial from everyone. David Walsh must be ecstatic. I wonder if that court case re LA's win bonuses will be re-opened ? Floyd doesn't feel guilty simply because they all do it.
Would love to see that fraud LA be brought to his knees. Greg Lemond should demand an apology from Trek.
Go to Top of Page

kxtr
National Champion

Germany
932 Posts

Posted - 20/05/2010 :  16:51:21  Show Profile  Visit kxtr's Homepage  Reply with Quote
http://forum.cyclingnews.com/showthread.php?t=7473

--> in the linked thread the (supossed to be) content of Landis' letter/mail is quoted as it is in several forums. I do not know if it's actually the original text or just something that popped out of nowhere. Doubts may rise as almost no name is spelled correctly.
If it's the real letter, than good news for DaveZ - he's not named here.


my new blog: http://waitingforthecaravan.blogspot.com
Go to Top of Page

Culkasi
Hors Categorie

United Kingdom
4080 Posts

Posted - 20/05/2010 :  17:06:57  Show Profile  Visit Culkasi's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Will be interesting to see ASOs reaction - could we see TDF without Radioshack?

Culkasi
Go to Top of Page

TeamB
Stagiaire

South Africa
47 Posts

Posted - 20/05/2010 :  18:21:19  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Armstrong must be fuming. Serves him right for emptying Landis' blood bag down the drain after hearing that he had signed for Phonak.

Why LA ever made a comeback is beyond me, he had everything to lose and nothing to gain. Liked the publicity too much.

Has anyone got the TDF rider names for US Postal in 2004 ?

Edited by - TeamB on 20/05/2010 18:23:05
Go to Top of Page

Barbarossa
National Champion

Denmark
373 Posts

Posted - 20/05/2010 :  18:35:40  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by TeamB

Armstrong must be fuming. Serves him right for emptying Landis' blood bag down the drain after hearing that he had signed for Phonak.

Why LA ever made a comeback is beyond me, he had everything to lose and nothing to gain. Liked the publicity too much.

Has anyone got the TDF rider names for US Postal in 2004 ?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_teams_and_cyclists_in_the_2004_Tour_de_France
Go to Top of Page

mashjaja
National Champion

USA
900 Posts

Posted - 20/05/2010 :  22:45:09  Show Profile  Visit mashjaja's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Question: Since he raised thousands of dollars in the Free Floyd fund which was to prove him innocent for something he knowingly was guilty of, couldn't someone(s)sue him for their donations back?

www.chaoscyclingclub.com/forum
Go to Top of Page

TeamB
Stagiaire

South Africa
47 Posts

Posted - 20/05/2010 :  23:14:38  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
It is disappointing to hear the UCI reject everything so quickly.
Surely they should take a conservative stance and wait until all the allegations come to the fore ? Was that not in the Hein Verbruggen era ? Why not have an internal investigation ?
Should their focus not be on catching cyclists that dope ? Why reject FL accusations so quickly ? The problem is that so much information is hidden from the public in this regard. I would actually want to interview Floyd in detail before rejecting him in public. They have shown their colours in support of Armstrong. Where there is smoke there is fire and when it's too good to be true then it usually is ...


Floyd is a marked man. When individuals own up to doping, people need to listen. To me is seems the UCI is determined to protect LA just in case their whole house of cards collapses.

What are the financial implications if his accusations are true ?

Edited by - TeamB on 20/05/2010 23:18:20
Go to Top of Page

sander
Hors Categorie

Belgium
2336 Posts

Posted - 21/05/2010 :  08:43:47  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I still think it's strange that he names Zabriskie. If he just did this to take revenge, he wouldn't do that. Of course the UCI is denying everything, the worst part is that about Armstrong bribing Hein Verbruggen.

Winner of the Vuelta Fantasy Game 2007
Go to Top of Page

kxtr
National Champion

Germany
932 Posts

Posted - 21/05/2010 :  10:40:29  Show Profile  Visit kxtr's Homepage  Reply with Quote


I don't trust Armstronge or Bruyneel but I don't trust Landis either. I guess you've all read the reactions of the Radio Shack camp. They claim, Landis has constantly contacted them in the time since his positive, asking for money, a job, threatening them, blackmailing them etc. Maybe they are exagerating, but I don't think they've just made this up.

The same might go for what Landis says - the text I linked above seems to make sense, there are countless other clues LA/JB had the team on a meds program and basically forced the riders to dope. But still I'm not sure about every detail, especially the story of them bribing the UCI. As far as I know, the UCI isn't the only institution that gets informed of a positive test, is it? Why would Armstrong and the hog tell someone like Landis of it?
In the linked text Zabriskie is not mentioned but apparently there are versions where he is - has Landis a number of different stories to tell? Putting in the current TOC leader in to make the bomb bigger?

Landis' past of denying everything (even under oath), the way he acted towards Greg Lemonnd, the story about him basically stalking a lot of persons - he doesn't seem to be a perfectly trustworthy or even sane person.


my new blog: http://waitingforthecaravan.blogspot.com
Go to Top of Page

Paul@CSC
World Champion

United Kingdom
1415 Posts

Posted - 21/05/2010 :  15:25:23  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
I think this article (blog) Submitted by Adam Myerson sums it up perfectly.

http://www.cycle-smart.com/blog/2010/05/20/pretty-boy-floyd

It's hard to argue with him although burning it all down is a little bit extreme. The most poignant thing is even believing floyd was a doper all along, he's actually come to like him..........

Honesty is the best Policy!!
Go to Top of Page

Ajax0
Hors Categorie

Denmark
3798 Posts

Posted - 21/05/2010 :  19:15:30  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
A new doping story - this one not as a big as the Floyd Landis scandal, though; the UCI has announced that Mickaël Larpe (Roubaix Lille Métropole) and Alessandro Coló (ISD-Neri) have been suspended. The former was tested positive for EPO on March 20 this year, while he was competing in GP Cholet-Pays de Loire, and the latter returned a test that showed abnormal high values of the asthma medicine Clenbuterol in a test performed during the Vuelta a Mexico on April 25.

Winner of the 2008 Tour de France and the 2009 Vuelta a España fantasy games!
Go to Top of Page

Ajax0
Hors Categorie

Denmark
3798 Posts

Posted - 27/05/2010 :  15:59:31  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Francesco De Bonis (ex-Serramenti PVC Diquigiovanni-Androni Giocattoli) has been suspended for two years - running from June 18, 2009, to June 17, 2011 - by the UCI due to abnormal values in his biological passport - and he's thereby the first rider to be convicted on evidence from his biological passport. Four other riders - Pietro Caucchioli, Riccardo Serrano, Igor Astarloa and Rubén Lobato - can expect the same kind of verdict, as they were all provisionally suspended alongside Francesco De Bonis, when the UCI announced the first five riders to have been "caught" with abnormal looking values in their biological passport.

Winner of the 2008 Tour de France and the 2009 Vuelta a España fantasy games!
Go to Top of Page

CrossRacer
National Champion

USA
322 Posts

Posted - 27/05/2010 :  22:03:21  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
One of the VeloNews reporters said that WADA has a rule about multiple offenses. New charges can only be made for an offense that occurred after the previous instance. Landis was charged in 2006. New charges can only be made against him for offenses that occur after 2006. So everything he is confessing happened before the 2006 positive test, and he cannot be charged or punished for his confessions. It is WADA code 10.6.1.
Go to Top of Page

Paul@CSC
World Champion

United Kingdom
1415 Posts

Posted - 28/05/2010 :  15:04:53  Show Profile  Reply with Quote
Garmin tells its staff to "Tell the truth no matter what"

http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/garmin-transitions-to-co-operate-with-investigations

Nice stance from Garmin and one which will hopefully allow the sport to turn a corner. I beleive in the statute of limitations but there may well be scope for an amnesty to clear all this up and move forward becasue like it or not, if everyone who has had their fingers in the pie is chucked out, then there won't be anyone left.................

Honesty is the best Policy!!
Go to Top of Page

kxtr
National Champion

Germany
932 Posts

Posted - 31/05/2010 :  17:55:10  Show Profile  Visit kxtr's Homepage  Reply with Quote
Valverde is banned worldwide for 2 years, starting January 2010.
He keeps his results
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/valverde-suspended-for-two-years-world-wide-keeps-results
http://www.tas-cas.org/d2wfiles/document/4238/5048/0/Award%20Valverdi%201396%20&%201402.pdf


my new blog: http://waitingforthecaravan.blogspot.com

Edited by - kxtr on 31/05/2010 17:58:09
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 28 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly
Jump To:
Team Saxo Bank © Riis Cycling A/S Go To Top Of Page
Snitz Forums 2000
  © 2006 Riis Cycling A/S - Firskovvej 36 - DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby Fax +45 9716 8480 - Contact Riis Cycling